9 research outputs found

    Online physician reviews: Is there a place for them?

    Get PDF
    Web-based physician ratings are increasingly popular but imperfect proxies for clinical competence. Yet they provide valuable information to patients and providers when taken in proper context. Providers need to embrace the reviews and use them to enact positive change in order to improve the quality of our patients' experience. Patients need to realize the limitations of online ratings, particularly with smaller sample size and be discerning about the reasons behind the review

    The significance of functional renal obstruction in predicting pathologic stage of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessing the severity of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has been difficult because of inadequate biopsy specimens. Additional predictive parameters of disease stage would be useful when deciding a treatment plan; it has been suggested that preoperative hydronephrosis can be a surrogate. We examined the relationship between preoperative ipsilateral renal obstruction identified by imaging with final pathologic stage after nephroureterectomy (NU) for UTUC. We then analyzed those patients with ipsilateral renal obstruction and examined if tumor location is associated with an advanced pathologic stage. METHODS: Patients who underwent NU for UTUC between the years 2001 to 2013 were analyzed and relevant staging studies and pathology were reviewed. Criteria for ipsilateral renal obstruction were defined by the presence of a delayed nephrogram on CT scan, renal cortical atrophy with associated hydronephrosis on cross-sectional imaging, and/or \u3e10% split function discrepancy on nuclear renal scintigraphy with associated hydronephrosis. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients met inclusion criteria; 26/82 (31.7%) had locally advanced disease (pT3/T4), while 56/82 (63.4%) had organ-confined (≤pT2) disease. Of the patients with pT3/T4 disease, 10/26 (38.5%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of functional obstruction of the ipsilateral renal unit; similarly, in patients with ≤pT2 disease, 21/56 (37.5%) demonstrated ipsilateral renal obstruction (P=0.93). Of the patients with ipsilateral renal obstruction, in those patients with pT3/T4 disease, 7/10 (70.0%) had ureteral tumor involvement while 9/21 (42.9%) patients with ≤pT2 disease had tumor in the ureter (P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that renal obstruction by radiographic analysis does not always predict advanced stage. In addition, there is a trend toward advanced stage when a patient has radiographic evidence of ipsilateral renal dysfunction and a ureteral tumor

    An Uncommon Presentation of Amyloidosis

    Get PDF
    Introduction AL amyloidosis is a rare disease, with only 1200-3200 new cases in the US per year.1 Two-thirds of patients are male; presentation typically occurs after age fifty.1,2,3 Amyloid can involve the kidneys (74%), heart (60-90%), liver (27%), peripheral nervous system (22%), and carpal tunnel (20%).3 We describe an atypical presentation of AL amyloidosis and highlight the importance of recognizing this disease in patients with systemic signs

    Factors Associated With Receipt of Partial Nephrectomy or Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients With Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Masses: Implications for Regionalization of Care

    No full text
    © 2020 Elsevier Inc. We aimed to identify factors associated with receipt of partial nephrectomy and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using the National Cancer Data Base. Overall, data showed an increase in utilization of MIS and PN from 2010 to 2014. Patients in the lowest socioeconomic groups were less likely to travel and were more likely to receive more invasive treatments. On the basis of these findings, additional research is needed on the effects of regionalization of surgery for RCC

    Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma

    No full text
    © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Introduction: The benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains poorly defined. Despite this uncertainty, the American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on localized renal cancer recommends that LND be performed for staging purposes when there is suspicion of regional lymphadenopathy on imaging. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to determine how much of a departure the new AUA guideline is from current practice. We hypothesized that practice patterns would reflect the “Expert Opinion” recommendation and that patients who are clinical lymph node (cLN) positive would receive a LND more often than those who are cLN negative. Additionally, we sought to determine factors that would trigger a LND as well the accuracy of clinical staging by examining the relationship between cLN and pathologic lymph node (pLN) status of patients who received a LND. Materials and methods: The NCDB was queried for patients with nonmetastatic RCC who underwent partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy from 2010 to 2014. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted. Frequency distributions were calculated for patients with both cLN and pLN status available. Of patients who received a LND, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of cLN status for pLN positivity were calculated. Logistic regression models were used to examine association between clinical and socioeconomic factors and receipt of LND. Propensity score matching was used in sensitivity analyses to examine potential for reporting bias in NCDB data. Results: We identified 110,963 patients who underwent surgery for RCC, of whom 11,867 (11%) had LND performed at the time of surgery. cLN and pLN information were available in 11,300 patients, of which 1,725 were preoperatively staged as having positive cLN. More LNDs were performed per year for patients who were cLN negative than cLN positive. Of patients who received a LND, the majority of patients were cLN negative across all clinical T (cT) stages. Multivariable analysis showed that all patients who had care at an academic/research institution (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43–1.74) and had to travel \u3e12.5 to 31.0 miles and \u3e31.0 miles to a treatment center (OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01–1.15 and OR: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.20–1.36, respectively) were more likely to get a LND. As cT stage increased from cT2-4, the risk of LND increased (OR range: 4.7–7.90, respectively). Patients who were cLN positive were more likely to receive a LND at the time of surgery (OR: 18.68, 95%CI: 16.62–21.00). Of the patients who received a LND, clinical staging was more specific than sensitive. Conclusion: More patients received a LND who were cLN negative compared to patients who were cLN positive. Patients who were cLN positive were more likely to receive a LND. Treatment center type, distance to treatment center, cT stage, and cLN positivity were factors associated with LND receipt

    Impact of pathologic lymph node-positive renal cell carcinoma on survival in patients without metastasis: Evidence in support of expanding the definition of stage IV kidney cancer

    No full text
    © 2020 American Cancer Society Background: Stage III renal cell carcinoma (RCC) encompasses both lymph node-positive (pT1-3N1M0) and lymph node–negative (pT3N0M0) disease. However, prior institutional studies have indicated that among patients with stage III disease, those with lymph node disease have worse oncologic outcomes and experience survival that is similar to that of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV disease. The objective of the current study was to validate these findings using a large, nationally representative sample of patients with kidney cancer. Methods: Patients with AJCC stage III or stage IV RCC were identified using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Patients were categorized as having lymph node-positive stage III (pT1-3N1M0), lymph node–negative stage III (pT3N0M0), or stage IV metastatic (pT1-3 N0M1) disease. Cox proportional hazards models compared outcomes while adjusting for comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier estimates illustrated relative survival when comparing staging groups. Results: A total of 8988 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6587 patients classified as having lymph node–negative stage III disease, 2218 as having lymph node-positive stage III disease, and 183 as having stage IV disease. Superior survival was noted among patients with lymph node–negative stage III disease, but similar survival was noted between patients with lymph node-positive stage III and stage IV RCC, with 5-year survival rates of 61.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 60.3%-63.4%), 22.7% (95% CI, 20.6%-24.9%), and 15.6% (95% CI, 11.1%-23.8%), respectively. Conclusions: Current RCC staging systems group pT1-3N1M0 and pT3N0M0 disease as stage III disease. However, the results of the current validation study suggest the need for further stratification and even placement of patients with pT1-3N1M0 disease into the stage IV category. Staging that accurately reflects oncologic prognosis may help clinicians better counsel and select patients who might derive the most benefit from lymphadenectomy, adjuvant systemic therapy, more rigorous imaging surveillance, and clinical trial participation
    corecore